PHEVs Use More Fuel Than Advertised, Major Study Finds

Share

The promise of the Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) has always been a seductive one: the “best of both worlds.” You get enough all-electric range for the daily commute and a combustion engine to kill range anxiety for weekend road trips. On paper, it’s the perfect bridge to a fully electric future.

But new real-world data suggests that promise doesn’t always hold up.

A comprehensive study by Germany’s Fraunhofer Institute found that many PHEVs consume significantly more fuel in everyday driving than their official lab ratings suggest — in some cases, up to three times more.

The Study: Real-World Data From 1 Million PHEVs

Unlike small-scale test programs, this research analyzed wireless driving data from approximately one million PHEVs produced between 2021 and 2023. That makes it one of the most comprehensive real-world evaluations of plug-in hybrid efficiency to date.

While manufacturers often tout fuel consumption figures as low as 2.0 to 2.5 liters per 100 kilometers—which translates to a staggering 94 to 118 MPG—the real-world average told a different story.

The study found that, in practice, these vehicles averaged about 6 liters per 100 kilometers (roughly 39–40 MPG). While 40 MPG is respectable for a crossover, it is nearly three times higher than the efficiency promised to consumers and regulators.

Why the Combustion Engine Keeps Kicking In

If PHEVs have batteries, why are they burning so much gas? The researchers noted that the internal combustion engine (ICE) engages far more frequently than laboratory simulations suggest.

– Aggressive Charging: In many models, the engine triggers to top up the battery even when there is still a remaining charge.
– High Revs: Once the engine engages, it often operates at high RPMs to quickly recharge the battery or provide immediate power, leading to a spike in fuel consumption.
– Driver Behavior: Real-world conditions—such as high-speed highway merging or cold weather—require more power than a lab-tested electric motor can provide solo.

Not All Brands Are Created Equal

The data revealed a clear divide between performance-oriented luxury brands and economy-focused manufacturers.

Porsche models sat at the high end of the consumption scale, averaging around 33 MPG (7 liters/100km). Porsche attributed this to “differing usage patterns,” reminding critics that their vehicles strictly comply with official EU testing standards.

Conversely, smaller PHEVs from brands like Toyota, Kia, Ford, and Renault proved to be significantly more efficient, often staying true to their electric-first mission when driven conservatively.

The Problem with the “Lab” (WLTP)

The discrepancy lies in the Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP). While meant to be more realistic than the older NEDC, it still relies on a two-part lab test:

– Charge-Depleting Cycle: Starts with a full battery.
– Charge-Sustaining Cycle: Runs with a depleted battery like a traditional hybrid.

The issue? These tests are run for only about 14.5 miles. Because many PHEVs can cover that distance almost entirely on electricity, their final “weighted” fuel economy score becomes artificially inflated.

A Regulatory Turning Point?

The Fraunhofer team is now urging the European Commission and global regulators to move away from laboratory benchmarks. Patrick Plötz of the Fraunhofer Institute suggests that emissions compliance should be based on actual road data rather than idealized cycles.

As automakers lean heavily into hybrid strategies to meet tightening carbon targets, this data serves as a wake-up call. The environmental performance of a PHEV depends less on what the brochure says and more on how often the driver actually plugs it in.

For U.S. buyers, the takeaway is clear: if you aren’t charging your PHEV every single night, don’t expect those triple-digit MPG figures to show up on your dashboard.

PHEV Efficiency Spectrum (U.S. Market)

Vehicle ModelAll-Electric RangeCombined MPGe (Charged)Combined MPG (Gas Only)
Toyota Prius Prime44 Miles127 MPGe52 MPG
Kia Niro PHEV33 Miles108 MPGe48 MPG
Ford Escape PHEV37 Miles101 MPGe40 MPG
Toyota RAV4 Plug-in42–52 Miles94–107 MPGe38–41 MPG
Chrysler Pacifica PHEV32 Miles82 MPGe30 MPG
BMW X5 xDrive50e40 Miles58 MPGe22 MPG
Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid28–31 Miles47 MPGe19 MPG
BMW XM (Performance)31 Miles47 MPGe14 MPG
[source: Fraunhofer, Techspot]

The post PHEVs Use More Fuel Than Advertised, Major Study Finds appeared first on Electric Cars Report.

The promise of the Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) has always been a seductive one: the “best of both worlds.” You get enough all-electric range for the daily commute and a combustion engine to kill range anxiety for weekend road trips. On paper, it’s the perfect bridge to a fully electric future.

But new real-world data suggests that promise doesn’t always hold up.

A comprehensive study by Germany’s Fraunhofer Institute found that many PHEVs consume significantly more fuel in everyday driving than their official lab ratings suggest — in some cases, up to three times more.

The Study: Real-World Data From 1 Million PHEVs

Unlike small-scale test programs, this research analyzed wireless driving data from approximately one million PHEVs produced between 2021 and 2023. That makes it one of the most comprehensive real-world evaluations of plug-in hybrid efficiency to date.

While manufacturers often tout fuel consumption figures as low as 2.0 to 2.5 liters per 100 kilometers—which translates to a staggering 94 to 118 MPG—the real-world average told a different story.

The study found that, in practice, these vehicles averaged about 6 liters per 100 kilometers (roughly 39–40 MPG). While 40 MPG is respectable for a crossover, it is nearly three times higher than the efficiency promised to consumers and regulators.

Why the Combustion Engine Keeps Kicking In

If PHEVs have batteries, why are they burning so much gas? The researchers noted that the internal combustion engine (ICE) engages far more frequently than laboratory simulations suggest.

– Aggressive Charging: In many models, the engine triggers to top up the battery even when there is still a remaining charge.
– High Revs: Once the engine engages, it often operates at high RPMs to quickly recharge the battery or provide immediate power, leading to a spike in fuel consumption.
– Driver Behavior: Real-world conditions—such as high-speed highway merging or cold weather—require more power than a lab-tested electric motor can provide solo.

Not All Brands Are Created Equal

The data revealed a clear divide between performance-oriented luxury brands and economy-focused manufacturers.

Porsche models sat at the high end of the consumption scale, averaging around 33 MPG (7 liters/100km). Porsche attributed this to “differing usage patterns,” reminding critics that their vehicles strictly comply with official EU testing standards.

Conversely, smaller PHEVs from brands like Toyota, Kia, Ford, and Renault proved to be significantly more efficient, often staying true to their electric-first mission when driven conservatively.

The Problem with the “Lab” (WLTP)

The discrepancy lies in the Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP). While meant to be more realistic than the older NEDC, it still relies on a two-part lab test:

– Charge-Depleting Cycle: Starts with a full battery.
– Charge-Sustaining Cycle: Runs with a depleted battery like a traditional hybrid.

The issue? These tests are run for only about 14.5 miles. Because many PHEVs can cover that distance almost entirely on electricity, their final “weighted” fuel economy score becomes artificially inflated.

A Regulatory Turning Point?

The Fraunhofer team is now urging the European Commission and global regulators to move away from laboratory benchmarks. Patrick Plötz of the Fraunhofer Institute suggests that emissions compliance should be based on actual road data rather than idealized cycles.

As automakers lean heavily into hybrid strategies to meet tightening carbon targets, this data serves as a wake-up call. The environmental performance of a PHEV depends less on what the brochure says and more on how often the driver actually plugs it in.

For U.S. buyers, the takeaway is clear: if you aren’t charging your PHEV every single night, don’t expect those triple-digit MPG figures to show up on your dashboard.

PHEV Efficiency Spectrum (U.S. Market)

Vehicle Model All-Electric Range Combined MPGe (Charged) Combined MPG (Gas Only)
Toyota Prius Prime 44 Miles 127 MPGe 52 MPG
Kia Niro PHEV 33 Miles 108 MPGe 48 MPG
Ford Escape PHEV 37 Miles 101 MPGe 40 MPG
Toyota RAV4 Plug-in 42–52 Miles 94–107 MPGe 38–41 MPG
Chrysler Pacifica PHEV 32 Miles 82 MPGe 30 MPG
BMW X5 xDrive50e 40 Miles 58 MPGe 22 MPG
Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid 28–31 Miles 47 MPGe 19 MPG
BMW XM (Performance) 31 Miles 47 MPGe 14 MPG

[source: Fraunhofer, Techspot]

The post PHEVs Use More Fuel Than Advertised, Major Study Finds appeared first on Electric Cars Report.

Leave a Replay

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all latest charging, regulatory, incentive, technology and renewable news

Sign up for our newsletter.  Get the latest news in renewables, EV’s , battery technology, the latest trends and EV Charging.